Last week, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had declared that as of the August third, 2019, all foreign trademark bidders, registrants, and parties to Trademark Trial and Appeals Board (TTAB) proceedings should be pictured by a lawyer who is licensed to observe within the US. This will affect all or any trademark appellants, registrants, and parties whose permanent legal residence or principal place of business is outside the United States. These parties should all have U.S. licensed attorneys representing them altogether USPTO trademark matters.
Also, the USPTO would need that most U.S. licensed attorneys who represent anyone before the USPTO in trademark matters must provide their State bar membership information and confirm they are an active member in sensible standing of that bar.
“Companies depend on the United States trademark register to create essential lawful choices concerning their brands. To keep up the accuracy and integrity of the register, for the good thing about all its users, the USPTO must have the appropriate tools to enforce compliance by all applicants and registrants. This rule may be a vital step in combatting fallacious submissions.” according to the director of the USPTO, Andrei Lancu.
This new rule requiring U.S. licensed attorneys in all trademark matters can probably contour the trademark prosecution process and guarantee trademark applicants are depicted by a party aware of United States trademark law. This new trademark rule is additionally expected to boost the standard of trademark application submissions. This rule amendment ought to return as no surprise to those practising in the international trademark space since many different countries need a domestic lawyer to represent foreign trademark candidates.
At the start of August third, unlike the present rule, Canadian patent lawyers cannot represent Canadian trademark appellants, registrants, or parties before the USPTO in trademark matters. However, Canadian trademark lawyers and representatives shall be able to represent their Canadian clientele, even though the USPTO will correspond only with the designated U.S. licensed attorneys.
This change is significant for foreign corporations trying to safeguard their brands with US emblems and that we suggest you speak with a U.S. licensed attorneys to prepare for this transition. This rule amendment is widely believed to stem from Chinese corporations having abused the US trademark filing system.
A huge number of Chinese immigrants are seeking emblems in the U.S., flooding the U.S. Patent and Trademark workplace with applications that officers say seem to be rife with false data.
The surge of filings from China has stunned the Patent and Trademark Office Database. Officials say it may be fueled by money subsidies that Chinese municipal governments are giving to citizens who register a trademark in a foreign country.
Trademark applications from China have increased over 12-fold since 2013 and for fiscal 2017 destroyed thousands over the combined filings from Canada, Germany and also the U.K. About one in each 9 trademark applications reviewed by the U.S. agency is China-based, according to government data.
Patent and trademark officials say money incentives may be a factor. As a part of a nationwide struggle to spread IP Ownership, China’s governments are paying citizens hundreds of dollars in Chinese currency for every trademark registered in the U.S.
Many Chinese applicants list addresses in the southeastern town of Shenzhen, usually noted as the Silicon Valley of China. Shenzhen pays corporations and people as much as roughly $800 for a U.S. registered trademark, according to the city’s intellectual-property bureau.
The U.S. officials say several China filings show a pattern of suspicious claims regarding the products in question and also the qualifications of the attorneys handling them.
“There’s been a dramatic increase in Chinese filings. A lot of [them] appear to be not legitimate,” the patent office’s trademarks commissioner, Mary Boney Denison, said at a Trademark Public advisory committee meeting last fall, according to a transcript.
The WSJ article goes on to discussion however faux trademark filings by Chinese firms are delaying legitimate trademark filers attempting to secure emblems with names are similar to those needed or secured fraudulently from China.
To qualify for a US trademark, the merchandise or service that the U.S. trademark is being wanted should be “used in commerce.” however unless another company is challenging the trademark, little proof is required to support the “in use” claim.
“There are instances once a screenshot of a list on Amazon or another e-commerce website is all an applicant required to demonstrate market activity.”
According to the Wall Street Journal, a variety of the Chinese corporations that incorrectly claimed to have been using their brand in U.S. commerce were drawn by U.S. licensed foreign attorneys not accredited to observe law within the U.S., “In one recent application, a Shenzhen address was listed for an attorney representing a Hong Kong client who had digitally altered a photograph to insert the word “Instamarket” over a Walmart storefront” and “more than a dozen Chinese candidates entered the name “Wendy” into the entry box for the lawyer name on the trademark application.”
Many months before, the world intellectual property Review, quoted a U.S. licensed attorney said, “If it weren’t politically taboo, there could be a section header in the rule change that reads ‘The USPTO is seeking to curtail problematic Chinese filings.”
For more information or if you need any legal help from U.S. Licensed Attorneys to reach out to Attorney Rivera, located in West Palm Beach, Florida.
Leave A Comment